<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ryan Rampersad &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Ideas &#38; Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20825</generator>
		<item>
		<title>★ Motorola Triumph Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2012/04/06/motorola-triumph-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2012/04/06/motorola-triumph-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triumph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=4850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s talk about the Motorola Triumph. It&#8217;s still the &#8220;best&#8221; phone you can get on Virgin Mobile and likely elsewhere that is also prepaid barring the slightly less fantastic Exhibit. Two weeks ago I forked over an arm and a leg to ditch my year-old long over-used Optimus V for this behemoth of a phone. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s talk about the Motorola Triumph. It&#8217;s still the <em>&#8220;best&#8221;</em> phone you can get on Virgin Mobile and likely elsewhere that is also prepaid barring the slightly less fantastic Exhibit. Two weeks ago I forked over an arm and a leg to ditch my year-old long over-used Optimus V for this behemoth of a phone. So let&#8217;s talk about the Motorola Triumph.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/motorola-triumph-large.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/motorola-triumph-large-424x580.jpg" alt="Motorola Triumph" title="Motorola Triumph" width="424" height="580" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3667" /></a></p>
<p>We already remember the first weeks &#8211; the glory of getting the newest phone in the market and praising how wonderful it was to finally have an actual smartphone. That&#8217;s how it was when the Triumph came out in Summer of 2011. It was short-lived though as quality control issues came to light through numerous blogs, forums and just about everywhere else. That tarnished my enthusiasm for the phone and <span title="though my father still bought it anyway">I held off from buying it</span>. I had been using my <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/09/dust-under-screen-lg-optimus-v/">replaced</a> Optimus V from February 2011, and was nearing the practical limits of what it could do, and only by deleting messages, application caches and just about everything to keep it from displaying the dreaded <em>low on spasce</em> notification, was I able to prolong its life.</p>
<p>The build quality problems I knew about were screen flickering issues, super-weak GPS signals and general system instability. If only I had a source for these uncited problems!</p>
<p>My particular handset does not exhibit the GPS problem, the flickering problem is more likely a software bug and even at that, it&#8217;s less noticeable overtime as you learn how to avoid it (wait at least four seconds between pressing the power button into sleep and then out of sleep). So my problems at the very least are not the usually reported problems, are at least not among those that were reported at release of the Triumph.</p>
<h3>The Big Problem &#8211; Wi-Fi</h3>
<p>No, my problem is with <strong>wifi</strong>. Yes, wifi, the very point of having a smartphone is Internet connectivity and through wifi at that. So what does my Motorola Triumph handset do? It crashes and then restarts.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the deal. At the University of Minnesota, we have a wifi network called &#8220;UofM Secure&#8221; because you need your &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.500">X500</a>&#8221; credentials to login, which is simply a username and password. This is technically a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1X">802.1</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Authentication_Protocol">EAP</a> network, which is all just a fancy authentication system based on WPA and WPA2. It&#8217;s secure and wonderful, and definitely beats having to authenticate through an open wifi network login page.</p>
<p>So with the Motorola Triumph, if I&#8217;m in an area with wifi, and it is already connected without going into <code>Settings &gt; Wireless &amp; networks &gt; Wi-Fi settings</code>, there&#8217;s a low chance of the crash. But if I do have go through settings to select the network (essentially forcing wifi to connect), it will often become unresponsive and then just crash! But then it gets better. It can do this multiple times if the network does not come back on its own without going through settings. The saving grace now is the phone is fast enough to restart in less than 30 seconds, but still. It is ridiculous to have a phone that crashes because it has connected to wifi.</p>
<p>But the problem does not end there, oh no. In fact, wifi problems continue. If I am connected and either downloading a page, podcast or using some sufficient amount of wifi data transfer, there&#8217;s a large possibility that I will lose the connection to the network. And you know that means &#8211; more chances to restart. Typically, this is rarer than the previous restarting problem, but it certainly does happen in places where the Optimus V (at the university) had no problems on the network. I can be reading in Google Reader and suddenly, <em>bam!</em> no wifi. But here&#8217;s the kicker &#8211; and a confusing point &#8211; it&#8217;s not just 802.1 EAP in this case. It happens at home to in my <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.11n">802.11n</a> network, the connection will suddenly drop out &#8211; just like that, in the blink of an eye.</p>
<p>To explain that better, let me contrast with the Optimus V. At home, I never had a wifi drop out, if it had gone to sleep and turned wifi off, it would reconnect seconds after waking up, no problem, and while using the phone itself, it would stay on perfectly for extended periods of time to the point it never actually dropped out while I was watching. Ever. For instance, my favorite podcast player, Listen by Google, would allow me to <em>listen</em> and download podcasts at the same time. The Motorola Triumph <em>cannot</em> do this because it will often drop out, and Listen even insists that when I try to listen/stream while downloading &#8211; especially while the download is incomplete, it will state, &#8220;An error occurred while playing this episode.&#8221; That error never came up on the Optimus V. It may not be related to the wifi, but the staggering amount <em>&#8220;Error (file not found)&#8221;</em> and <em>&#8220;Error (connection timed out)&#8221;</em> notices I receive from Listen is surely a sign of the wifi problem &#8211; it simply cannot keep up a stable connection for an entire 60MB file.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not just Listen, it&#8217;s something as simple as browsing. I can be checking my bus schedule and be <em>unsurprised</em> that what I thought was just slow Internet on campus was actually due to the phone losing the connection yet again.</p>
<p>There are certainly lesser problems in the phone, but this is the one I demand to be fixed. It absolutely must be solved. Either by software or hardware or <em>magic</em>.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about some other observations. I have had this phone for two weeks; long enough to get a feel for oddities.</p>
<h3>Battery Life</h3>
<p>Let&#8217;s begin with the battery life. In a normal school day, I clock in at 6am and clock out around 3pm (and by clock in and out, I mean take off and put on the phone from the charger). By noon, I usually from down to 55% with light to moderate usage, though with heavier usage it goes to 40%. That&#8217;s no a big deal. Now, if for some reason wifi is being <em>insane inane</em> on any given day and it disconnects and reconnects continuously, well, say goodbye to that battery &#8211; 40% by 9am! Great. Actually, barring that exception, I&#8217;m pleased with the battery life in the phone. I have not had a close call yet, and I feel like I need to keep more battery life for a longer day (like Wednesday with my physics lab through 5pm), I go into Airplane mode with cuts me off from the celluar network (and who needs that during lab?) Since I only read and despise games, this works fine for me. No problems there.</p>
<h3>The Keyboard</h3>
<p>Now how about that keyboard? Here&#8217;s an example of my poor typing with the stock Android keyboard.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Now, how abiut rhat keyboars. This keybaord isbso easyto use becuas it ahs no ictiondarg. Revooutinary right? This is ibsabity.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Why did it come out like this? Because <em>autocomplete</em> does not exist on this phone naturally. Oh no, somehow, there is no dictionary except for your previously imported list of contacts and built-in names. So the words, &#8220;about&#8221;, &#8220;keyboard&#8221;, &#8220;easy&#8221;, &#8220;because&#8221; and more are unintelligible because it cannot correct them, it doesn&#8217;t know them. This demonstrates a lack of &#8230; what, I don&#8217;t even know? Who decides to sell a phone without an autocorrection dictionary? Who&#8217;s fault is this? Motorola&#8217;s? Google&#8217;s? The World&#8217;s? My solution was to install the <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=inputmethod.latin.ported#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDUwMSwiaW5wdXRtZXRob2QubGF0aW4ucG9ydGVkIl0">ICS Keyboard</a> that was simply too slow on the Optimus V (and immature at the time). But do normal people even know they can do this? My father certainly does not and his messages look like they were often written by birds (that may be angry).</p>
<h3>Speed &amp; Stability</h3>
<p>Speed and stablity are interesting topics. Barring the occasional wifi-restart, the phone is generally stable. I run LauncherPro as the homescreen, and it runs with minimal effects enabled (none of that cubic nonsense) without any problems, the apps drawer scrolls smoothly, webpages, long lists and everything scrolls just fine. Stability wise, I&#8217;ve rarely had an app crash on its own and if it did, it was Facebook, and that didn&#8217;t work well on the Optimus V anyway. Switching from portrait to landscape works fast and flawlessly, where on the Optimus V, it was quite slow. On the Triumph, the phone is pretty much always responsive to the touch, but a problem is the capacitive menu, home and back buttons are <em>less</em> responsive than the actual screen, so I have to hit them multiple times quite often to know I registered a response. The haptic feedback helps, but it&#8217;s minimal.</p>
<h3>Comfort</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve spoken about comfort before. Comfort is in terms of being able to swipe with one&#8217;s thumb from corner to corner of the phone. That is <em>kinda</em> possible but not easy with this Motorola Triumph&#8217;s huge 4.1&#8221; diagonal screensize. In fact, it almost hurts. Actually, it does hurt to overextend; with two hands the problem is solved, because you can hold with one hand and swipe with the other. So now I know why everyone claims smaller phones are better. The screensize is great and all, but the pixel density is more important for me compared with actually being able to interact with the controls. If you&#8217;re holding the Triumph in one hand, it&#8217;ll be a tricky maneuver to hit that notifications bar, which apparently is something you do pretty often. </p>
<h3>The Network</h3>
<p>Initially, I heard various reports of weak 3G reception and that reasoning isn&#8217;t condemned by the fact there is visually 4 bars on the Motorola Triump while there are 5 on the Optimus V. I&#8217;m not exactly sure what that means, but in my experience, the Motorola Triumph is fine in the University of Minnesota, Saint Paul region. The bars are a bad indicator of 3G service, and as far as I know, I have always been able to send and receive text messages in all but the deepest depths of the great buildings at the university.</p>
<h3>The OS &#8211; Android 2.2.2</h3>
<p>What else is there? How about the operating system itself? Android 2.2.2 isn&#8217;t bad; but it has no more to offer than my already year-old phone, the Optimus V, running the same. 2.3.5 I believe is the leading version of Gingerbread but I don&#8217;t even remember what it could do; let alone improve performance. It doesn&#8217;t matter either way, every app functions perfectly &#8211; nobody can drop 2.2 support because, well, there are 96% of all Android phones running that. Oh yeah. That said, after having experienced the glorious Ice Cream Sandwich, well, it&#8217;s a shame this phone will <em>never</em> support either an official build or completely a self-installed variant. Hacking the TouchPad to support CM9 was easy enough but on the phone it&#8217;s a slightly different story.</p>
<h3>Wrap Up</h3>
<p>So, how about a numeric score? I like the 1-5 scoring system, but let me explain how I broke the score down all down.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>-1</strong> for the many and consistent wifi connectivity problems</li>
<li><strong>-0.1</strong> for the outdated version of Android despite being available for more than a year and half, software wise and hardware wise</li>
<li><strong>-0.1</strong> for the insane screensize and minor discomfort</li>
<li><strong>-0.2</strong> for a completely broken stock keyboard
</li>
</ul>
<p>Despite those cons, I liked that the phone is suitably fast for a 1GHz processor and modern phone smartphone; it actually feels fast enough to be smart, and that goes for being responsive too. And of course, for having more storage space even after twice as many apps as I had on the Optimus V at the end of its life. So my <em>final score</em> is 3.6 out of 5. So that&#8217;s a 72% satisfaction rate, which is considered a B+ in my physics courses; a C- in the curvless world.</p>
<h3>Bonus</h3>
<p>While writing this, I did a little more testing. Using my favorite <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.farproc.wifi.analyzer&#038;hl=en">Wifi Analyzer</a> and Listen to download an episode of Tech News Today. The episode in question was only 25MB. While it was downloading in the background, I was watching the Analyzer. My office is about 8 feet away from the n-router, and that&#8217;s separated by a single wall. In that time, the wifi dropped out from a nearly -30 dbm signal to a mere -80 dbm signal and of course the download was interrupted; my laptop was still receiving wifi perfectly right next to the phone. Wikipedia explains that anything around <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBm">-10 dbm is the ceiling on wifi signal</a> but anywhere from -30 to -70 are fair game for wifi. A drop from -30 dbm to -80 dbm is definitely unusual as this is a logarithmic scale and that&#8217;s like dropping 50 orders of magnitude. So I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m making all of this up.</p>
<p>Despite all of this, I consider myself lucky as there were no restarts while writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2012/04/06/motorola-triumph-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ Book Review: The Name of the Wind</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/09/28/book-review-the-name-of-the-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/09/28/book-review-the-name-of-the-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kingkiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kvothe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=4292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In June I bought my first Audible audio book and it was The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss. To save myself and you from having to read another long and inarticulate description, why not just read about it where justice is served chilled. Instead, I&#8217;ll tell you what I thought of it. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In June I bought my first Audible audio book and it was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Name-Wind-Kingkiller-Chronicles-Day/dp/075640407X">The Name of the Wind</a> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Rothfuss">Patrick Rothfuss</a>.</p>
<p>To save myself and you from having to read another long and inarticulate description, why not just <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Name_of_the_Wind">read about it where justice is served chilled</a>. Instead, I&#8217;ll tell you what I thought of it.</p>
<div id="attachment_4294" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 367px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/the-name-of-the-wind-cover-2.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/the-name-of-the-wind-cover-2-357x580.jpg" alt="The Name of the Wind" title="The Name of the Wind" width="357" height="580" class="size-medium wp-image-4294" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The best cover art for the book yet - mysterious and cold blue</p></div>
<div class="warning">
I rate this book 4.5 stars out of 5, or on Amazon&#8217;s star rating, 4 out of 5. The book is repetitive in some parts and the initial setup is long and almost overwhelming, but after that, it gets better.</p>
<p>I suggest you pick up a copy and read it slowly. There are light spoilers below (e.g. what happens but not <em>how it happens</em>).
</div>
<p>The book&#8217;s split time lines do nothing to confuse me. I know exactly when something <em>is</em> taking place &#8211; there is a definite distinction between the keeper-Kvothe and <em>hipster</em>-Kvothe in their style of talking and what is taking place. For instance, in the inn, nothing exciting happens except the two instances of mystical attacks from <em>spider things</em> and a possessed mercenary. Something like that, at any rate.</p>
<p>Kvothe reads his past out loud to his audience of both the scribe and his fairy helper Bast. It might seem odd at first to tell a story this way, but it essentially becomes its own <em>book</em> as if it were written in first person narrative form anyway. In fact, it might be better that the majority of the book is in the first person when listening in audio form. It feels as if Kvothe is telling <em>you</em> the story.</p>
<p>The most repetitive section is of Kvothe&#8217;s living the giant city, Tarbean. His poverty and depressing attitude was almost enough to make me lose interest in the long run. It feels as if it takes forever because there is no <em>scientific magic</em> in that part, but once it ends, the magic comes into the story pretty well.</p>
<p>You can imagine the book comprised of three parts, the first part of Tarbean, the second is comprised of his first struggles at the University where he gets kicked out of the library, meets his <em>humanoid arch-nemesis</em> and meets his <em>girlfriend</em>, and the third where Kvothe defeats a dragon of sorts. The ending is actually after the <em>third part</em> in his narration, but it feels as if the climax lies somewhere within heart of the dragon.</p>
<p>The struggles with Kvothe&#8217;s lover is interesting. She is mysterious and has men surrounding her most of the time, but she accepts none of them and she says it is because they are not understanding of her either. Kvothe tries to hide his feeling from her and she toys with him in a whimsical way, but neither admit their love for each other, although Kvothe is known to admire her in more than one way.</p>
<p>The magic introduced, sympathy as it is named, is unique from any other type of magic scheme I have encountered in my many years of reading fiction. It&#8217;s unlike the rhyming nature of Stile in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apprentice_Adept">Apprentice Adept series</a> and it is not elemental like that of the magic in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Sun">Golden Sun&#8217;s Weyard</a>. Of course in addition of the <em>scientific magic</em> sympathy, there is runic magic that rely on the same principles and alchemy but it is more than just <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullmetal_Alchemist">slapping their hands together</a>. The true mysterious magic is the magic of absolutely understanding so well, <em>to know it&#8217;s name</em>. Kvothe has a brief glimpse of the name of the wind late in the story and even while fleeting, it wields it powerfully.</p>
<p>The Name of the Wind is a long book full of exciting <em>tales</em> except for a few areas of prolonged engagement. It maintains a high standard of writing, excellent descriptions and well formed character interaction. In my case of the Audible audio book version, Nick Podehl voices Kvothe&#8217;s old and younger self differently making the transition points easier. His masterful interpretation of the <em>forgien</em> voices from Kvothe&#8217;s teenage friends from other countries also had depth to otherwise simple words on a page.</p>
<p>Fantasy is a hard genre. Harry Potter has ruined magic for children and many young adults and sparkling vampires have ruined the fairy creatures for the same audience. There is no book that will appease everyone, but this makes a great stab at penetrating the mind for the <em>kids beyond their years</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/09/28/book-review-the-name-of-the-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ HP TouchPad: The First Experience</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/08/27/hp-touchpad-the-first-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/08/27/hp-touchpad-the-first-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchpad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=4273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the day of the TouchPad firesale, I took it upon myself to spend what little remaining balance I had from graduation and buy my first tablet. After a delay from BestBuy, it has finally arrived in perfect working order. These are initial thoughts from my first experience with the $99 HP TouchPad. I haven&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the day of the <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/18/apple-wins-without-throwing-a-punch/">TouchPad firesale</a>, I took it upon myself to spend what little remaining balance I had from graduation and buy my first tablet. After a delay from BestBuy, it has finally arrived in perfect working order.</p>
<div id="attachment_4274" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hp-touchpad-box-front.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hp-touchpad-box-front-580x435.jpg" alt="HP TouchPad - The Box" title="HP TouchPad - The Box" width="580" height="435" class="size-medium wp-image-4274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I wish the HP Computer boxes looked this good. Clean, simple and very clear on what&#039;s inside.</p></div>
<p>These are initial thoughts from my first experience with the $99 HP TouchPad. I haven&#8217;t used it long &#8211; a few days at most has it sat in my house on my kitchen counter, and maybe just over five hours of total hands on time. That&#8217;s constitutes my basis.</p>
<p>My first thought as I opened the shipping box: it looks like the MacBook Air&#8217;s box. It has a picture of the TouchPad on the front and for the most part, everything else is white except for its name on the sides and a little bit of crediting information on the lower back side.</p>
<p>A truly shameful moment caught me next. I could not grasp how to open the TouchPad box without damaging it. The MacBook&#8217;s box was easy to open, simply hold the cover and let the weight of the bottom section slide the bottom-box out. Easy. But the TouchPad was different, it had a side-loaded box. I was not sure if I needed to pull a tab away to let it loose, or some other mystical and innovate method open it. After an embarrassing four minutes, I pulled the side out revealing the TouchPad.</p>
<p>The TouchPad&#8217;s compartment was clean: a side-box for cables and a main portion delegated to the goods: the hardware itself. It was wrapped in a plastic sheet for protection and that was luckily easy enough to peel off.</p>
<p>After locating the power button the top of the TouchPad, a little HP logo appeared on the screen. It was generously about the size of a nickel and did nothing apparent for about two minutes but it started to pulsate and glow eventually. For another three minutes I waited for <em>something</em>.</p>
<p>I ended up on a language selection screen, then a country selection screen and finally a confirmation prompt. The TouchPad then launched me into a Wifi-setup dialog.</p>
<div id="attachment_4275" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/touchpad-wifi-setup.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/touchpad-wifi-setup-580x435.jpg" alt="TouchPad - Wifi Setup" title="TouchPad - Wifi Setup" width="580" height="435" class="size-medium wp-image-4275" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This dialog kept coming up despite enter the correct details at least eight times, on ninth or tenth, it figured out that it was connected</p></div>
<p>This Wifi dialog was honestly frustrating and I am rarely frustrated with these kinds of things. I am sure it was obvious mistake I made, but I waiting for ages to get it to work. The TouchPad discovered my Wifi network easily. I tapped it and another dialog appeared entitled <em>&#8220;Join Integral&#8221;</em> with a text box under it. I assumed it was for the password, but a little indication would&#8217;ve been nice. After entering the network password, I would continue but the Wifi-setup dialog would simply come back. I went through this about ten times before it finally registered.</p>
<p>Finally connected, the TouchPad asked me to agree once, agree twice and make an account for WebOS. Then some more mystery setup time was taken from my life followed by the first <em>&#8220;The device will restart…&#8221;</em> I have ever seen on a mobile device.</p>
<div id="attachment_4276" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/touchpad-device-restart.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/touchpad-device-restart-580x435.jpg" alt="TouchPad - Restart after setup" title="TouchPad - Restart after setup" width="580" height="435" class="size-medium wp-image-4276" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The TouchPad has to restart after setup, so what is this? An OS from 1999? Windows? What&#039;s going here?</p></div>
<p>Once I was through all of the setup nonsense, I was at the <em>home</em> screen of <em>nothing</em>. I was not entirely sure what the next step was, so I did what I always do when I am out and see a tablet: I go to my <em>business card</em> homepage.</p>
<div id="attachment_4277" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ryan-on-the-touchpad.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ryan-on-the-touchpad-580x435.jpg" alt="Ryan on the TouchPad" title="Ryan on the TouchPad" width="580" height="435" class="size-medium wp-image-4277" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Any store with a device with a browser, I leave my homepage up when I leave - it&#039;s only fair, I&#039;m testing it, after all.</p></div>
<p>And that was my first experience with the HP TouchPad. It was pretty fast, except for all that setup-waiting I had to do, and it was <em>pretty</em> in a sense that it looked ascetically pleasing. You can <a href="https://plus.google.com/103163894873322469147/posts/X1LGsDeCjdP">see my full gallery</a> of unboxing and setup pictures and egerily await more thoughts on the HP TouchPad, coming soon.</p>
<p class="signoff"><em>Happy touch-pad-ing.</em></p>
<div class="note">Thanks goes out to Ian Buck for <a href="https://plus.google.com/103163894873322469147/posts/aYkVjVg4dTJ">commenting on the poor editing</a> in this post. That&#8217;s what I get for <em>publishing too soon</em>. If anyone wants to be my editor, I&#8217;d absolutely love it.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/08/27/hp-touchpad-the-first-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ Angry Birds for Chrome Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/05/13/angry-birds-for-chrome-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/05/13/angry-birds-for-chrome-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 05:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=3326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During Google IO 2011, Google annouced that even their own App Store would have the platform invading Angry Birds game from Rovio. If you hadn&#8217;t heard of Angry Birds, you must have been living under a rock. With the deployment of Angry Birds to a bigger platform, Google Chrome, it&#8217;s now possible to not only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During Google IO 2011, Google annouced that even their own <a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/aknpkdffaafgjchaibgeefbgmgeghloj">App Store</a> would have the platform invading <a href="http://www.rovio.com/">Angry Birds game from Rovio</a>. If you hadn&#8217;t heard of Angry Birds, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCFMDLakxaY">you must have been living under a rock</a>. With the deployment of Angry Birds to a bigger platform, <em>Google Chrome</em>, it&#8217;s now possible to not only play on your iPod touch, iPhone, iPad, a morass of Android handsets, your Mac, your PC, but also now in your browser. In fact, I think my list is missing a few.</p>
<p>I first played Angry Birds about eight months ago in October of 2010 when I bought my first iPod touch 4G. I played more recently when Amazon open their own Appstore with Angry Birds Rio as the free-app-of-the-week for Android. It&#8217;s always been a lot of fun, either smashing pigs or release fellow birds. That said, I like the simple improvements they made in the new Chrome version.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start out with the obvious. It&#8217;s huge. I can see everything because it&#8217;s not sitting in a 3.5 inch screen anymore &#8211; it&#8217;s on a 21&#8242; monitor running at 720p. It&#8217;s fantastic.</p>
<div id="attachment_3327" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/front-end-screen.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/front-end-screen-300x222.png" alt="Angry Birds - Chrome!" title="Angry Birds - Chrome!" width="300" height="222" class="size-medium wp-image-3327" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zoomed Way Out - Angry Birds on Chrome</p></div>
<p>One gripe I always had was that the restart control was hidden in a slide out menu instead of being on the mainscreen. That made the price of restarting higher because it took two taps/clicks instead of one. In the new Chrome version, the restart button is now aligned to the left of the game screen and it&#8217;s much easier to try something, hate your choice, and quickly restart before someone else looking over your shoulder notices. It&#8217;s just that easy.</p>
<p>Controlling the birds angling and firing is a nice change. Using your fingers was a great way to draw people in but the accuracy and precision wasn&#8217;t always there. Or maybe I&#8217;m just clumsy without my mouse.</p>
<p>Finally, there are some special Chrome-extras. For instance, on various levels, you&#8217;ll see a little Chrome-logo floating around or sitting somewhere. Once you hit it, you&#8217;ll get your points and it&#8217;ll disappear from the level entirely. It&#8217;s a one-time bonus. They&#8217;re not always easy to get to either.</p>
<div id="attachment_3328" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/three-stars-ab.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/three-stars-ab-300x228.png" alt="Three Stars" title="Three Stars" width="300" height="228" class="size-medium wp-image-3328" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Finally, I got 3 Stars - Angry Birds on Chrome</p></div>
<p>I give Angry Birds a <em>5 of out 5</em> for the simplest of improvements that just come naturally for being on the big-screen. Great work, Rovio, and of course, Google, for making Chrome excellent. Finally, I offered a shorter review on the <a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/aknpkdffaafgjchaibgeefbgmgeghloj#">Chrome Web Store for Angry Birds</a>. Oddly, there is no way to link to individual review. Here it is.</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s hard for the same game to get better every time it&#8217;s remade and put on a different platform. This edition of Angry Birds actually puts the restart button on the game screen so experimenting is encouraged now. I&#8217;ve officially played Angry Birds on more platforms than any other game, ever. It&#8217;s really fun and I really hate games.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/05/13/angry-birds-for-chrome-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ Galaxy Tab Wifi Spring 2011 Software Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/04/27/galaxy-tab-wifi-spring-software-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/04/27/galaxy-tab-wifi-spring-software-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=3131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second part of the Samsung Galaxy Tab Wifi review is here! I started a review of the Galaxy Tab however the Hardware portion of the review was incredibly long. This is the Software portion. I have a lot less to say about the software because it is just Android after all. The Software The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second part of the Samsung Galaxy Tab Wifi review is here! I started a review of the Galaxy Tab however the <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/04/25/galaxy-tab-wifi-spring-hardware-review/">Hardware portion of the review</a> was incredibly long. This is the <strong>Software</strong> portion. I have a lot less to say about the software because <em>it is just Android after all</em>.</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/galaxy-tab-wifi-small.png" alt="Galaxy Tab Wifi - Banner" width="580" height="171" /></p>
<h2>The Software</h2>
<p>The Galaxy Tab Wifi offers the same system that the 3G models do. It&#8217;s nothing special or different in that regard. However, compared to a blank slate (pun?) installation of Android like my LG Optimus V, it&#8217;s a little different.<br />
<span id="more-3131"></span><br />
Let&#8217;s start out with the home-screen. I believe the Launcher is not <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TouchWiz">TouchWiz</a>. I think it&#8217;s just some special Samsung Interface for the Launcher. When you start the Galaxy Tab up, you&#8217;re greeted with the normal Android 2.2 Lock-screen with the slide-to-unlock and Mute sliders. Sliding to unlock shows the home-screen. In the <em>vertical</em> orientation, here&#8217;s the break down. There is the pane location indicator at the top, nearest to the notifications bar.  Then by default the normal Google search bar with Voice functionality. Then you get a bunch of app-icons. By default there is the Market and the useless Samsung App Store. Then YouTube, Camera, Calendar, Kindle and other apps as well. You can swipe to a different pane for something they call the daily briefing which is a digest of weather, news, and stock information. The Samsung/Android equivalent to do the Springboard in iOS or the Dock in OSX is weak. It houses the Applications menu along with two quick jumping buttons for <em>Email</em> and <em>Browser</em>. I was tempted to change this to Launcher Pro but I resisted for the review&#8217;s sake.</p>
<div id="attachment_3134" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 185px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-190819.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-190819-175x300.png" alt="Home Screen" title="Home Screen" width="175" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-3134" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The GTW Home Screen with a few customizations</p></div>
<p>The Applications menu itself has two screens of default apps. I&#8217;ll list the interesting apps. First, you get the standard pile of build Android apps but with customizations. For instance, the Tab version of the calculator looks different from it does on my Optimus. Then you have the Daily Briefing and Digital Frame apps which serve as poster-board style applications running when you aren&#8217;t using the device. There&#8217;s the default Gmail app, Latitude and of course Maps. I&#8217;m pleased to see someone thought it was a good idea to include a basic Memo-app like Notes on iOS. There is Music and Music Hub which is a lame version of iTunes the store. Then Places, Navigation, and Google Talk of course. Task Manager is included so you can kill apps. And that&#8217;s basically all the apps that are blatantly Samsung-touched. Qik and Moviefone are there, but they&#8217;re just the same as always.</p>
<div id="attachment_3136" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 185px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-202016.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-202016-175x300.png" alt="Applications Menu" title="Applications Menu" width="175" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-3136" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Applications Menu - Tons of Samsumg-y-apps</p></div>
<p>The notification drawer is actually useful on the Galaxy Tab. It has quick access to Wifi, Bluetooth, GPS, Silent and the Orientation Lock. I condemned the hardware for not having a physical button for the orientation lock but I suppose this is a decent solution. The other shortcuts are generally useful and well place by being always accessible. On my Optimus, to toggle Wifi, I need to use a widget on one of my home-screen panes. A unique feature is the brightness slider. It also has a check box toggling auto-control that will control brightness based on the viewing content and ambient line in the room.</p>
<div id="attachment_3137" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 185px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-202029.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-202029-175x300.png" alt="Notifications Drawer" title="Notifications Drawer" width="175" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-3137" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Notifications Drawer with toggles and slider.</p></div>
<p>Android apps all function the same as far as I know. Facebook&#8217;s app, for example, sucks just as much as it does on my phone. It&#8217;s not nearly as polished as the iOS app. TweetDeck is really nice because it has the advantage of a spacious UI. Pandora works exactly the same but it&#8217;s great being able to view the album art.</p>
<p>I have a special place in my heart for the Kindle for Android app. I first experimented with Kindle on my computer, then my iPod touch 4G and now this. I never bothered with it on my phone because the display was just too small. The Galaxy Tab&#8217;s size is perfect for reading. The application is beautiful. When you start it, you&#8217;re brought to a screen with a list of your books. You optionally can have them turn into book-tiles in a grid view, which I prefer. When a book is opened, it will position itself to your orientation, but you can optionally lock it without setting the system-wide orientation lock. Swiping to turn pages will always be stupid in my opinion. Sure, it looks good in ads but in practice it&#8217;s annoying, so they allow you to do both a swipe and a simple tap. The problem persists however I always need to hold it in my right hand so I can tap on the right side-edge to move to the next page, on the right. So they&#8217;ll need to work on that.</p>
<div id="attachment_3135" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 185px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-202005.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SC20110424-202005-175x300.png" alt="Kindle for Android" title="Kindle for Android" width="175" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-3135" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kindle for Android viewing my collection - beautiful cover art!</p></div>
<p>The Camera app is my father&#8217;s favorite app I think, built-in. Here&#8217;s what it does. It offers a resolution by default of 2048 by 1232. It has options for white balance, effects, ISO and image quality ranging from normal to superfine. It also can handle automatic geo-tagging. The shortcuts on the side of the viewfinder itself are: exposure control, flash control, scene control and finally mode. The flash control has three settings, off, on and auto. The flash is bright and works pretty well. It&#8217;s a huge LED. The scene control offers Portrait, Landscape, Night and Sports. These change the way light is interpreted and makes adjusts based on movement, light and probably other factors. Finally, Mode offers Single shot, Panorama, Smile shot and Self-shot. Single shot uses the back camera with its high quality resolution, the panorama can merge different shots together at .7mp quality, Smile shot lets you wait while your target smiles, which is clever. Finally, self-shot uses the front facing camera with 1.3mp of quality to picture yourself. Finally, the highest picture quality, it claims it can save around 8800 pictures to the internal memory card. Video is good too. The video side of the Camera app has less settings. It can toggle flash on or off. Exposure control is also an option. Audio capture is available but has to be set in the options panel. It&#8217;s just your standard camera app for video. </p>
<p>The browser is unique in that it does not require you to hit the options button to get to different tabs. On the browser address bar, there different buttons. Standard buttons for back and forward, a quick memo-pad, a button that shows you open tabs by screenshot, and finally favorites and history. The memo-pad shortcut can jot down notes and that&#8217;s about all, but handy for copy and pasting information since Android&#8217;s native copy and pasting support is a big poor. Since there are no true tabs, but instead windows, the on-screen access to the other windows (or tabs) is nice. Of course, the browser has the usual settings. But it additionally has toggles to enable/disable javascript and enable/disable plugins on demand. Flash support you know, well, it works but it&#8217;s jittery. I watched Leo Laporte for at least an hour on Twit Live via his flash player. It worked well enough there. With the browser it&#8217;s fast and easy to use. My one minor complaint is that it hides the notification drawer, so I can&#8217;t check on other things very well.</p>
<p>I noticed that the ringtones on the Galaxy Tab and my Optimus are different. Now, one is a phone and one is not, but why are they different? I guess I noticed but promptly forgot, but there are many differences between the Galaxy Tab OS and the OS on my phone, despite both being Android 2.2 Froyo. Seriously, if someone says there is fragmentation, they are correct.</p>
<p>Overall, the software is good. With more options available, I think it could border perfect, but you know how <em>locked down<em> Android is. And that concludes the software review of the Galaxy Tab Wifi. This review on only software ended </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/04/27/galaxy-tab-wifi-spring-software-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ Galaxy Tab Wifi Spring 2011 Hardware Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/04/25/galaxy-tab-wifi-spring-hardware-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/04/25/galaxy-tab-wifi-spring-hardware-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=3122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 11th, Samsung released a wifi only version of the 7&#8221; Galaxy Tab. It wasn&#8217;t covered very well in the news so it took me a while to find out. For things like that, Samsung, you need to make a little bit bigger announcement. Seriously. Anyway, I like to write initial reviews for products [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 11th, Samsung released a <a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/galaxy-tab/GT-P1010CWAXAR">wifi only version of the 7&#8221; Galaxy Tab</a>. It wasn&#8217;t covered very well in the news so it took me a while to find out. For things like that, Samsung, you need to make a little bit bigger announcement. Seriously. Anyway, I like to write initial reviews for products I get. So here we go. <em>This review became so long that I split it into two parts! This first one will cover the <strong>Hardware</strong> and second section will come later focused on the <strong>Software</strong>.</em></p>
<p><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/galaxy-tab-wifi-small.png" alt="Galaxy Tab - Banner" title="Galaxy Tab - Banner" width="580" height="171" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3127" /></p>
<h2>The Hardware</h2>
<p>The Galaxy Tab with Wifi <em><span title="a shorter name is a little better">(GTW)</span></em>. It has that same 7&#8221; screen that the 3G models do. It has the same look and feel without carrier branding. It has the same kind of glossy plastic body. It&#8217;s the same. Except for Wifi. That&#8217;s it. You&#8217;ll want to checkout the spec-sheet here.<br />
<span id="more-3122"></span><br />
First, let&#8217;s start out with the body of the GTW. It&#8217;s heavy. It&#8217;s allegedly 13.8 ounces. Imagine a full can of soda and then a little more. Of course, it&#8217;s different than that because it&#8217;s spread out of 7.5 inches. So it&#8217;s probably a little lighter in apparent weight than a can of soda. Compared to the Kindle, it is much heavier but then, the Kindle does not have a glass screen and the GTW is much thicker. The depth is listed on the spec-sheet so there&#8217;s no reason to repeat that here. Without looking it up, I&#8217;m going to venture that it is thicker by a few millimeters than the iPad 2. It could by thiner than the first iPad. Since the iPad 2 is huge with it&#8217;s printer paper size screen, the weight will be clearly be more. The texture is nice. The back is plastic but it&#8217;s glossy smooth so it&#8217;s like glass anyway. The rims are almost a smooth-matte but not quite glossy and not quite matte. That&#8217;s probably for the best. Unfortunately, the front-panel screen part and the rims aren&#8217;t seamless so it could accumulate dust so a case is probably a good idea. </p>
<p>The screen is expansive compared to the LG Optimus V I have. Yes, it is glossy. It&#8217;s not a bad thing. I&#8217;ve used it in day light for a morning and it was tricky without standing in a shadow or facing towards the sun and using its own shadow. One of my obsessions with the iPhone stems from the way Apple made the screen and the bezel. The iPhone&#8217;s screen is perceptually at the bezel&#8217;s height. In other words, there does not appear to be a gap between the screen and the bezel. From my experience, there is no difference major difference between the screen and the bezel on the Galaxy Tab. On the other hand, when the screen is off on the GTW, it appears to be a <span style="background-color: #464357; color: #fff;">dark-gray-blue color</span>, maybe, and the bezel is black. You can always tell there is a screen. I can&#8217;t remember what the iPhone and iPad look like their off states, but I doubt they&#8217;ll do much better to meet my ideal: black bezel and black off-state screen. It&#8217;s the <a href="http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/monolith.jpg">perfect</a> <em>black monolith</em>. With that said, the screen is bright. Although this is a little software-y, the screen has this ability to auto-adjust the brightness based on the content you are viewing and probably based on the ambient light sensor. This is designed to save battery life but it could also be used to set different light settings &#8211; in the dark, brighter, in the light, dimmer. Something like that but in practice I don&#8217;t know the pattern. </p>
<div id="attachment_3126" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/gtw-outside.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/gtw-outside.jpg" alt="Galaxy Tab - Outside" title="Galaxy Tab - Outside" width="580" height="445" class="size-full wp-image-3126" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Galaxy Tab: Outside in the shade</p></div>
<p>Moving along from the screen to other features. The speakers on the bottom of the Galaxy Tab are really great. I don&#8217;t know what speakers, if at all, the original iPad had. I don&#8217;t know further what speakers the iPad 2 has. These speakers are compared to what I can get with <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2010/05/22/central-undergraduate-awards-google-computer-award/">my Google laptop</a> and that&#8217;s from 2007 and really cheap. The two speakers are located on either side the charging port. You know, you&#8217;re getting tablet-quality sound and it&#8217;s nothing to write home about. The audio-jack is actually yet again on the top but in this case I think it makes sense. I wouldn&#8217;t put the tab upside-down in my bag, I would put it normally. On phones, you should put your phone in your pocket upside down so when you withdraw it, it comes out right-side-up.</p>
<p>From there, there are the buttons. There aren&#8217;t enough. Why is there no orientation lock and no mute button? Well, you get a volume rocker and it works well enough, just hold it a while and it&#8217;ll go all the way up or down. The power button isn&#8217;t on top like my phone&#8217;s power button is so it&#8217;s a little confusing, it&#8217;s on the right side instead.The left side is devoid of any buttons except the not-quite-a-button memory card slot. Oh, it can hold up to an extra 32gb microSD card in addition to that huge 16gb internal memory. What else? The charging port. Didn&#8217;t Apple sue Samsung for some scary intellectual property theft? Well, clearly, Samsung is using some very Apple-like power connector? Does micro-usb now provide enough power? Does regular USB not provide enough power? Or was it to capitalize on the massive number of pre-made and already well-established Apple dock products? I think so. </p>
<p>More on buttons. Did I mention there are not enough? The normal interaction buttons like, <em>options</em>, <em>home</em> and <em>back</em> are not physical but instead that pseudo-button. They could be haptic-style buttons but I didn&#8217;t keep haptic-feedback on since I hate vibrations. Anyway, that is annoying because you cannot easily tell what to push, you have to guess and remember or you have to just <em>see buttons before you can press them</em>. What if it&#8217;s dark? And then the problem of having to turn the screen back on with only the <em>power button</em> instead of using any front button. I guess if it&#8217;s in your pocket, this could be great because your jeans won&#8217;t mangle your buttons but then, why are you putting a 7&#8221; tablet in your pocket? You should just hold it.</p>
<p>Now, my father&#8217;s favorite. Those cameras. We have matching LG Optimus V phones. We love them. Their camera is decent at 3.2MP. The Galaxy Tab has two cameras though. The back is a 3MP which is a tad lower than our comparison phone but the difference is so tiny. The front facing camera is a weak 1.3MP but compared to .739MP of the iPad 2 and the iPod touch 4G, it&#8217;s a certain upgrade. So. Cutting to the chase: the cameras are great. I&#8217;m really taking my father&#8217;s opinion here. He loves the interface for taking the pictures. He likes how crisp pictures come out on the device itself. On our phones, with their relatively low resolution display, they aren&#8217;t as nice as they would appear on a computer screen. I&#8217;m not sure what what resolution those pictures are taken as. It probably doesn&#8217;t matter since they look great on Facebook and that&#8217;s where they all end up anyway for normal people. Video taken with the Galaxy Tab is decent too at 720p and a decent framerate, but again, I don&#8217;t know nor care about the specific details.</p>
<p>Now, finally, let&#8217;s talk about Wifi. My comparison stems from my phone and my previous iPod touch 4G. It was my impression at the time that the iPod had a better antenna than the phone because pages would load faster on the iPod than on the phone. Maybe that was case but then a study came out stating Android was faster at display webpages. I smell definition obscuring there (rendering speed is faster, not the actual download speed). With the Galaxy Tab, because of its size, it has a huge antenna. With that still-drafty wireless-n standard card, it reaches farther than my other devices. For instance, Windows reports 2-bar of wifi on an wireless-n based laptop (dv6), while the tab reports 2-bars of wifi. The phone reports 1-bar. The wireless-n dual band modem is situated at the other end of the house, where the house is between me and it along with a garage and maybe four walls. So that&#8217;s pretty good, 40 feet away with obstacles in the way.</p>
<p>And that concludes my <strong>hardware review</strong>. The Galaxy Tab is impressive. For the modest price of $350 to boot. I&#8217;ll release my software review, that will in fact end up being much shorter, soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/04/25/galaxy-tab-wifi-spring-hardware-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ ServeStream for Android</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/30/servestream-for-android/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/30/servestream-for-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=2955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love listening to podcasts from TWIT. I use Miro on my server and stream the videos to whatever computer I&#8217;m using at the time while I&#8217;m at home. It&#8217;s not a big deal. However, my biggest desire since I bought my lovely little android phone was to be able to stream and audio-only version [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love listening to podcasts from <a href="http://twit.tv/">TWIT</a>. I use Miro on my server and stream the videos to whatever computer I&#8217;m using at the time while I&#8217;m at home. It&#8217;s not a big deal. However, my biggest desire since I bought <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/02/28/lg-optimus-v-review/">my lovely little android phone</a> was to be able to stream and audio-only version of the podcasts. I found the application to do it.</p>
<p><a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/servestream/">ServeStream</a> is <a href="https://market.android.com/details?id=net.sourceforge.servestream">a free application in the Android Market</a>.<br />
<a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/servestream-logo.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/servestream-logo.png" alt="ServeStream" title="ServeStream" width="256" height="256" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2956" /></a></p>
<p>ServeStream is really simple. It can play streaming media from just about any URL you give it. </p>
<blockquote><p>
- Supports the following media formats:<br />
Audio: mp3/m3u/pls/3gp/mp4/m4a/ogg/wav/mid/xmf/mxmf/rtttl/rtx/ota/imy<br />
Video: 3gp/mp4<br />
- Added support for streaming playlist files (.m3u) and SHOUTcast streaming (.pls)<br />
- Supports multitasking/playing audio in the background<br />
- Repeat and shuffle modes<br />
- Widget support<br />
- Utilizes HTML parsing to allow navigation of HTTP media servers that serve HTML pages
</p></blockquote>
<p>It was kind of sad I couldn&#8217;t use the obvious Winamp app to steam from a custom URL. ServeStream saved the day and it&#8217;s free. It works fantastically to stream my MP3 stream. I gave it a review and five stars. Great work William Seemann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/30/servestream-for-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ HP Pavilion dv7-4170us Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/30/hp-pavilion-dv7-4170us-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/30/hp-pavilion-dv7-4170us-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">?p=2964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my mother&#8217;s friends recently bought a good looking HP Pavilion dv7-4170us laptop from Micro Center. Her friend knew I was a little geeky so he let me optimize his brand new computer for him. Since I didn&#8217;t have much time with the laptop, this review will be relatively short. Despite not having much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my mother&#8217;s friends recently bought a good looking HP Pavilion dv7-4170us laptop from Micro Center. Her friend knew I was a little geeky so he let me <em>optimize</em> his brand new computer for him. <del>Since I didn&#8217;t have much time with the laptop, this review will be relatively short</del>. Despite not having much time with the laptop, this review is actually really long.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/hp-p-dv6.jpg"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/hp-p-dv6.jpg" alt="HP Pavilion dv7-4170ys" title="HP Pavilion dv7-4170ys" width="300" height="300" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3089" /></a></p>
<h3>The Hardware</h3>
<p>The look and feel are great. The aluminium finish looks clean and simple. Since the owner is a truck driver, the aluminium body makes sense because it should be extra-sturdy for on the road conditions. The etching is not districting because it is such a light color compared to the background metal color. The etching however can be felt under the finger easily.</p>
<p>The keyboard is interesting. In my personal opinion, after typing this review on the laptop in question, my hands really hurt. Let&#8217;s start with the good though. The keys are finished in matte and the layout is a full size without any key crunching. It&#8217;s a MacBook Pro-esque <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiclet_keyboard">chiclet</a> design, which I think is quite appealing. The downsides is this: the letters are spaced really far a part. Maybe I wasn&#8217;t used to typing on the laptop yet, but after ten minutes, my hands were getting achy. You&#8217;ll need to practice using the keyboard a while before getting used to having keys spread so far from each other if you&#8217;re not used to the chiclet keyboard design. Another observation is that some keys when typing quickly will seem to squeak under the touch. My mother&#8217;s friend doesn&#8217;t type as fast as I do and probably won&#8217;t notice that, but it certainly drove me a little insane.</p>
<p>The screen is bright and vivid just as everyone says it is. Looking at the screen from maybe 30 degrees of center, it still maintains a pretty clear image with modest brightness. Looking from 30 degrees off center from above does reduce the brightness more than from side to side, but really, who does this in the real world? The size is huge and the default resolution is 1600 by 900. That however does mean it is not running at true 1080p. After looking, the default resolution is the max resolution. Not a big problem, really.</p>
<p>The trackpad. What can I say? Someone messed up. It was a mistake to include such a insensitive touchpad. I know what they were going for: MacBook Pro class trackpads. I know that was the goal and it was missed entirely. Tap to click works, but it&#8217;s not always picked up the first time. The drivers support two finder scrolling but it is very annoying to use. Perhaps an update will solve that one day, but the lack of responsiveness makes the very useful feature very useless. The click buttons are located on the bottom of the trackpad. I noticed that I tend to leave my thumb hovering over the button and mouse with my other fingers, but sometimes I rest my thumb and I cause the mouse to spasm. The size is great at least.</p>
<p>I have first hand experience with facial recognition built into laptops. This one is better because it has finger print recognition. Why is that better? Lighting conditions don&#8217;t matter at all and you rarely loose your finger; a bad hair day won&#8217;t thwart your successful login. Jokes aside, the biometric scanner on the right side of the computer is small, out of the way and pretty much just works.</p>
<p>The other goodies spec wise. Starting with 600GB hard drive split two ways between the main drive and a recovery partition, it is rather roomy for movies or pictures or whatever people put on hard drives these days but <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148527&#038;Tpk=ST9640320AS" title="based on model number from Speccy">it is 5400RPM</a> so it is terribly slow. The laptop comes with the industry standard 4GB of DD3 which is excellent. With dedicated graphics in the mid-range in the scheme of things, it&#8217;s actually possible to play modest looking games. It is an ATI Mobility Radeon, but I don&#8217;t have anymore specific details on that end. Finally, the processor is not the typical i5 Intel I&#8217;ve come to expect in HP laptops. It&#8217;s actually a AMD Phenom II N850 Triple-core. It felt snappy doing just about everything except when accessing the hard drive, but that&#8217;s no surprise. Among the three, a hard drive upgrade would benefit the dv7-4170us the most.</p>
<h3>The System &amp; Software</h3>
<p>As always when buying a computer from a retail store, there is a load of junky software that nobody wants. This HP Pavilion is no exception to this rule.</p>
<p>The first boot caused the HP registration program to fire up. It wasn&#8217;t really annoying but you&#8217;d expect it to be just three lines: your name, email address and whether or not you want HP updates. But no, your address, phone number and more other extraneous bits are needed. Also, I don&#8217;t quite like that it looks so blurry. On a high definition screen, it&#8217;s safe to crank out the graphics, HP.</p>
<p>Upon entering Windows, there was a little top-docked dock. I&#8217;m leaving it there since it&#8217;s not really bothersome and it does give quick access to the HP-oriented features. The other evil installed program was Norton. I quickly removed that and replaced it with the much better Security Essentials provided by Microsoft.</p>
<p>Microsoft Office was preloaded through a trial program and Micro Center apparently sold my mother&#8217;s friend a $119 Office Home &amp; Student key. For the <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116856&#038;cm_re=office_2010_home_and_student-_-32-116-856-_-Product">same price on Newegg</a>, he could&#8217;ve got a three-pack. Just saying. At least it was easy to enter the serial key and get it installed.</p>
<p>Chrome and Firefox were installed thereafter and loaded with Ad Block Plus for Good Measure<sup>&trade;</sup>. I was surprised but pleased to find Flash, Silverlight and Java preinstalled. I&#8217;m glad too because I doubt a <em>Normal Person<sup>&trade;</sup></em> could install plugins like that. I hid the Internet Explorer icon even though IE9 is pretty good. Just stick with Chrome, kids.</p>
<p>In the scheme of things, the system wasn&#8217;t loaded down with too much aside from the general HP sillyness. On my initial inspection before I did anything to the system, it was running with the expected 88 processes, with no visible foreground running programs. After uninstalling some junk and adding some good things like Chrome and Security Essentials, and while running other programs at the same time, I find that it runs at 96 processes. That&#8217;s pretty good. Overtime, I find laptops need more and more processes from the manufacture to work properly. It&#8217;s a shame but the bitter reality of laptops.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, at 96 processes, the system is only burning through 43% of it&#8217;s available memory. I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s split among Windows at 15% and HP 28%.</p>
<p>While the HP laptop does have a huge drive and a clearly marked Recovery partition, I wanted to make recovery discs anyway. Well, it takes five DVDs and about 5 hours. It was a lovely time to do some reading.</p>
<h3>The Conclusion</h3>
<p>I believe this laptop was purchased for about $800 after tax. It was a good deal considering there is a $50 mail in-rebate and the specs of the system. On Amazon, I&#8217;ve seen many five star reviews and a few lower ones based around individual build defects. For me, and my mother&#8217;s friend, this computer seems great and is perfectly adequate for just about anyone who wants a fast big-screen decently weighted laptop for under a grand.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to my college laptop shopping: if HP makes something similar in a 14-inch package, I might consider it. If you want me to review a computer, give it to me for a week and I&#8217;ll give you a bittersweet review based on what&#8217;s excellent and what sucks.</p>
<p>Have a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/30/hp-pavilion-dv7-4170us-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ Dust Under Screen &#8211; LG Optimus V</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/09/dust-under-screen-lg-optimus-v/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/09/dust-under-screen-lg-optimus-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=2903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about a week ago, I wrote about the fantastic LG Optimus V on Virgin Mobile. There&#8217;s a lot of coverage about the Optimus V &#8211; a solid phone and great plan. I&#8217;ve had it for three weeks now, and I&#8217;m in love with the device itself and the plan too of course. However, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about a week ago, I wrote about the fantastic <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/02/28/lg-optimus-v-review/">LG Optimus V on Virgin Mobile</a>. There&#8217;s <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13845_3-20040570-58.html">a lot of coverage about the Optimus V</a> &#8211; a solid phone and great plan. I&#8217;ve had it for three weeks now, and I&#8217;m in love with the device itself and the plan too of course.</p>
<p>However, I noticed a problem. I&#8217;ve noticed dust <em>under the screen of the phone</em>. It sounds silly, but let me try to explain. The phone&#8217;s screen is covered with a generic universal protector cut to just size. That&#8217;s great. I clearly failed when putting it on and can tell there is a bit of dust here and there. You can easily see surface level dust and know what it is. The thing is, in the bottom left corner of my Optimus V, next to the memory card slot and above the options button, you can very easily see a small stream of dust <em>under the screen</em>.</p>
<p>A picture might illustrate what I mean better. Sorry for the low quality.<br />
<a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/lg-optimus-v-dust-under-screen.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/lg-optimus-v-dust-under-screen.png" alt="" title="LG Optimus V - Dust Under Screen" width="580" height="435" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2904" /></a></p>
<p>You might notice the short white line emerging from the corner of the screen. That&#8217;s the dust line. From there, it quickly fans out in a triangular pattern and becomes very sparse. From what I can tell, there are other people having this problem with other <strong>LG Optimus</strong> models.</p>
<p>There is <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=863045&#038;page=1">a thread about the dust problem on XDA-Developers</a>. The Optimus V is mention at least once specifically in the thread.</p>
<blockquote><p>Sad to say mine is an optimus V and it is also getting dusty under the screen. So people are saying that LG won&#8217;t cover this under warranty? If not I may try and open it and blow it myself. Is there a consensus as to where it&#8217;s getting in from? &#8211; (<a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11353989&#038;postcount=64">xda-developers forum</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>This <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-ZK2gupajo">Optimus One video</a> shows my problem (and I suspect many other&#8217;s problem as well) very accurately. It would certainly suck to need to switch to a new phone again but I&#8217;d rather do that than have dust infiltrating my precious device.</p>
<p>I want to know if other people experiencing this <em>dust under the screen</em> problem? I have my Radio Shack&#8217;s warranty and I imagine I have LG&#8217;s warranty. The phone works perfectly but it looks <em>bad</em>. I want it to last and if I need to get a new one or get it fixed, I&#8217;d prefer to do it sooner than later.</p>
<div class="warning">
<h3>Update (June 2011)</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s been about a month since I received a new LG Optimus from Radio Shack after returning my old dust filled model. Basically, I was sent a gift certificate via email with the credited price. Then I went into a Radio Shack yet again to re-buy the same phone. That worked out fine but it wasn&#8217;t exactly cheap. The credit was for $160.68, so that made me pay $39.31 for the phone itself and another $30 for plan that previously made this all possible. All in all, this came out around $246.08, which means I lost $85.23 in case to replace a phone with a defect that wasn&#8217;t my fault. Stay classy LG and you too Radio Shack, stay classy.</p>
<h3>Update (May 2011)</h3>
<p>On May 8th I brought <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/02/28/lg-optimus-v-review/">my Virgin Mobile LG Optimus V</a> into a <a href="http://www.radioshack.com/home/index.jsp">RadioShack</a>. At first they weren&#8217;t sure if I was talking about there being dust under the screen protector, but after explaining and showing them, they thought it was pretty strange too. They said they hadn&#8217;t seen it before, <span title="on any phone, at any time, anywhere. I wonder about that...">ever</span>. Thanks to my <em>$30</em> replacement plan, I am being credited $160.68 to cover the price of the phone plus tax. Unfortunately, when I bought the phone in February, the national price was only <em>$150</em> but has since has increased to <em>$199</em>. So I&#8217;m still loosing out $75 (extra $30 to buy it again, another $30 for another replacement plan and $15 on tax) on another phone when it wasn&#8217;t my fault. I&#8217;ll update everyone on the results soon!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/09/dust-under-screen-lg-optimus-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>★ LG Optimus V Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/02/28/lg-optimus-v-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/02/28/lg-optimus-v-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/?p=2851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Tuesday I finally bought a smartphone. Prior to last week, I had nothing more than a mere LG Rumor Touch. While it wasn&#8217;t terrible, it wasn&#8217;t anything like my iPod touch. So my review compares the Optimus very closely with the iPod touch. The Plan The LG Optimus V. The V isn&#8217;t a roman [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Tuesday I finally bought a smartphone. Prior to last week, I had nothing more than a mere <a href="http://www.virginmobileusa.com/cell-phones/lg-rumor-touch-phone.jsp">LG Rumor Touch</a>. While it wasn&#8217;t terrible, it wasn&#8217;t anything like my iPod touch. So my review compares the Optimus very closely with the iPod touch.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/lg-optimus-v.png"><img src="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/lg-optimus-v.png" alt="" title="LG Optimus V" width="556" height="546" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2888" /></a></p>
<h3>The Plan</h3>
<p>The LG Optimus V. The <strong>V</strong> isn&#8217;t a roman numeral five, instead it stands for Virgin Mobile, my carrier. My plan is the $25/month beyond talk plan which includes 300-minutes and unlimited data and texting. I never use more than 100 minutes in any 30 day period so I have no worries there. I tend to text a moderate amount so that&#8217;s not a problem. I use data more now than on my old Rumor Touch because it can actually reach 3G speeds. While the plan marks data as being unlimited, I doubt it really is. I&#8217;ve heard there is a cap somewhere around 5GB or 8GB, I&#8217;m guessing the lower amount.</p>
<p>I bought the Optimus V from Radio Shack for $149.99. The <a href="http://www.virginmobileusa.com/cell-phones/lg-optimus-v-phone.jsp">Virgin Mobile website as of this posting also has it set at $149.99</a>. Oddly, the Sprint version, the Optimus S is set at $299 but marked down in a series of ridiculous ways to only $49.</p>
<div class="note">
<h5>Update (May 2011)</h5>
<p>At <a href="http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=11231368">RadioShack</a>, the LG Optimus V is now $199.99. Even on the <a href="http://www.virginmobileusa.com/cell-phones/lg-optimus-v-phone.jsp">Virgin Mobile USA website</a>, the price is set at $199.99. It&#8217;s sad that such a great phone gone up in price instead of going down. The price of popularity, I guess?</div>
<h3>The Hardware</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s almost identical to the <a href="http://shop.sprint.com/NASApp/onlinestore/en/Action/DisplayPhones?phoneSKU=LG670KIT">Spring model</a>, except the buttons on the bottom of the phone are switched around for some absurd reason. No big deal. </p>
<p>When I wrote my review on this year&#8217;s iPod touch, I mentioned its weight compared to the iPhone 4 I held back in July. <em>&#8220;Impossibly heavy for being so small&#8221;</em> was my impression of the iPhone. The Optimus unfortunately does not get the same distinction. The weight feels as if it were just right for the appearance and overall size. It&#8217;s 4.69 oz. while the iPhone is 4.8 oz. That&#8217;s a minuscule difference but in reality you would feel it.</p>
<p>Moving along, it&#8217;s a good size. The screen is 3.2 inches diagonal, which is only a little smaller than my iPod touch. If you have been using a larger screen before this phone, you probably will notice the reduced space. Typing isn&#8217;t cramped but it isn&#8217;t the same. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really want to describe the entire set of physical dimensions when the website will take of care it so just <a href="http://www.virginmobileusa.com/cell-phones/lg-optimus-v-phone.jsp">check that out there</a>.</p>
<p>A lot of people are asking for comparisons to the Samsung Intercept. When I held one briefly, I noted that it was much lighter than my old Rumor Touch. Now I think the Optimus and Intercept are close in weight with the Intercept being slightly heavier due to the keyboard. The physical differences between the two are the lack of a keyboard for the Optimus and the lack of a good placing for the sleep button on the Intercept. On the Intercept, you have to orient your hand to push a very low button but on the Optimus it&#8217;s on top which makes it like the iPod touch placement.</p>
<p>The biggest difference is the screen resolution. I had some figures to compare between Intercept and Optimus but I lost them. It is safe to say though that if you&#8217;re comparing a iPod touch 4G, you&#8217;ll seriously notice. If you&#8217;re using an older iPod touch, probably not so much. The iPod touch screen may or may not have been glass, but the Optimus is not glass. The Intercept is and while it is smooth and probably remain quite flawless in the long haul, plastic is lighter.</p>
<h3>The Software</h3>
<p>After living with iOS for nearly seven months, I&#8217;ve gotten used to it.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with the keyboard. By default, <em>swipe</em> is enabled. After months of typing on the iPod touch, and years of typing with fingers pressing keys, swiping to type isn&#8217;t exactly first nature. I switched to the Android keyboard. While better for me than swipe, it&#8217;s not exactly perfect. Accuracy doesn&#8217;t seem very high, I make many more mistakes than I ever did before. Auto-completing text isn&#8217;t very good either. Someone mentioned, <em>&#8220;I&#8217;d rather have the (android) keyboard take a while to figure some good suggestions rather than instantly giving me twenty worthless ones.&#8221;</em> I feel the pain there certainly. The <em>smiley face</em> button is annoying also. Why is that there? I hit it when I mean to hit delete and I end up with five extra things to delete.</p>
<p>How about the Apps? I use only a few apps. Gmail (email), Facebook, Twitter for Android, LastPass, Pandora, SpringPad and Google Voice. Those are the downloaded apps with the exception of Gmail. On my iPod touch, sure, I downloaded more apps but they were games that I didn&#8217;t really need or want. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about email. I wanted a phone that could give me email without needing Wifi. I can do that now. The Mail app on iOS is lovely but doesn&#8217;t take advantage of labels. The Gmail app certainly does. I do have a few problems with it though. It&#8217;s not quite as simple as the Mail app. For example, the frame for typing is a box that takes the whole screen instead of just being a continuous white space. Functionality isn&#8217;t complicated, but just not as simple as an interface.</p>
<p>The Facebook app isn&#8217;t as fancy as the iOS version. It works great but I can&#8217;t do somethings. For example, making an shortcut icon to a friend&#8217;s profile doesn&#8217;t work. The app feels slower, just a bit. Twitter for Android <em>is not Twitterrific</em>. That&#8217;s the only thing I can say about that &#8211; quality is the big difference.</p>
<p>Pandora works great, just as well as it does on the iPod touch. Not a big deal. Oddly, LastPass for Android works a lot better on Android than iOS. On the iPod touch, it would often crash on me for no real reason. My only gripe here is not having an easier way to retrieve passwords; e.g. not making me enter my full password twice, just a pin-code afterwards. SpringPad works just fine &#8211; like it always does.</p>
<p>Like the iPhone and BlackBerry, text messages are stored in a conversation style view. Instead of the Rumor Touch style view, where each message is on its own screen, messages between you and your contact are shown together, with the most recent on the bottom. I remember fondly the old days; I&#8217;d write a text on my Rumor and forget part of what my friend said and then hit the back button, causing my message to saved as a draft first. Annoying. Texts are so much easier to work with now. If your contact has a picture stored in Contacts, it&#8217;ll display there as well. I wonder &#8211; the Google Voice app takes over the Phone app when calling, but it doesn&#8217;t take over when texting. Missing some integration there, maybe.</p>
<h3>Finally</h3>
<p>The <strong>LG Optimus V</strong> is seriously an excellent phone. It&#8217;s only my second cell phone ever. From a Rumor Touch to a decent Android smart phone. Moving up the ladder, certainly, <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2010/07/16/the-great-iphone-price/">without paying the iPhone price</a>.</p>
<p>If you have questions about the phone, ask here or ask the good people over at <a href="http://www.virginmobileusa.com/cell-phones/lg-optimus-v-phone.jsp#BVQAWidgetID">Virgin Mobile&#8217;s Ask &amp; Answer</a>.</p>
<div class="note">
<h3>Update (March 2011)</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed dust under the screen of my three week old LG Optimus V. <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/09/dust-under-screen-lg-optimus-v/">Read the full story</a>.
</div>
<div class="warning">
<h3>Update (May 2011)</h3>
<p>On May 8th I brought my Virgin Mobile LG Optimus V into a <a href="http://www.radioshack.com/home/index.jsp">RadioShack</a>. At first they weren&#8217;t sure if I was talking about <a href="http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/03/09/dust-under-screen-lg-optimus-v/">there being dust under the screen protector</a>, but after explaining and showing them, they thought it was pretty strange too. They said they hadn&#8217;t seen it before, <span title="on any phone, at any time, anywhere. I wonder about that...">ever</span>. Thanks to my <em>$30</em> replacement plan, I am being credited $160.68 to cover the price of the phone plus tax. Unforntuately, when I bought the phone in Feburary, the national price was only <em>$150</em> but has since has increased to <em>$199</em>. So I&#8217;m still loosing out $75 (extra $30 to buy it again, another $30 for another replacement plan and $15 on tax) on another phone when it wasn&#8217;t my fault. I&#8217;ll update everyone on the results soon!</p>
</div>
<div class="note">
<h3>Update (June 2011)</h3>
<p>If you were thinking about buying this phone, you might want to wait a bit. There is a new Virgin Mobile phone waiting in the wings with better specs: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/virgin-mobile-welcomes-4-1-inch-motorola-triumph-brings-froyo-t/">the Motorola Triumph</a>. Not much is known about it other than a few hardware specs and there are certainly not hands on consumer reviews. Just something to think about.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryanrampersad.com/2011/02/28/lg-optimus-v-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.502 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-20 12:32:14 -->

